If an attacker got in today, would you catch them?

Because most SOCs grew tool by tool and nobody has measured how well the whole thing works against real attacks. An assessment gives you an honest, evidence-backed baseline and a costed path to improve, so investment goes where it changes the outcome rather than where it feels urgent.

We benchmark against recognized SOC maturity models and map detection coverage to attacker behavior using MITRE ATT&CK. The combination gives you both a maturity rating and a concrete view of what your defenses would actually catch.

No. We assess in-house teams, outsourced arrangements, and hybrids. If anything, an assessment is especially useful when responsibility is split, because that is where coverage gaps and unclear ownership tend to hide.

Then you have the clarity to fix it, with a prioritized roadmap. Many clients use the findings to build the case for investment, and some move to our Managed Detection and Response to close the gap quickly. The point of measuring is to improve.

Two to four weeks from kickoff to findings: documentation review, analyst interviews, detection coverage measurement against ATT&CK, and a live look at how alerts actually flow.

A maturity score against the agreed model, detection coverage mapped to ATT&CK, the workflow bottlenecks observed, and a prioritized roadmap with quick wins separated from structural fixes.

No. Interviews are scheduled around shifts, and observation is passive. The team usually finds the process validating: it surfaces the constraints they have been working around.

No. The roadmap stands on its own whether you build, keep, or buy. If the answer is to strengthen your in-house SOC, that is what the report says.

Fixed scope, based on SOC size and telemetry breadth. The deliverable and timeline are agreed before work starts.

A SOC assessment is the Validate motion applied to your detection capability, and its roadmap feeds Guard and Implement.