Digital Forensics. Reconstruct exactly what happened.

Whenever knowing what actually happened matters as much as getting systems back. If there is any chance of data theft, regulatory notification, an insurance claim, or legal action, preserve the evidence and bring in forensics. Rebuilding first often destroys the trail you will later need.

Yes. We work from forensic copies of disk, memory, and logs rather than the live systems where possible, so the investigation runs alongside your recovery. Where live collection is needed, it is scoped and supervised to keep disruption minimal.

That is the point of a defensible chain of custody. We handle, document, and analyze evidence to a standard built for exactly those audiences, and we work alongside your counsel and insurer throughout so the report supports your position.

They run together. Incident Response contains and recovers, while DFIR establishes the full truth of what happened. In a live breach the two work side by side, and the forensic findings drive the hardening that follows.

Evidence preservation guidance starts on first contact, so nothing is lost while access is arranged. Imaging and collection typically begin within days, faster under a retainer.

Scoped by the number of systems and the depth of analysis required. Investigations run as fixed-scope engagements with the deliverables agreed up front.

Yes. Evidence is collected and documented to a standard that supports legal proceedings, and we work under counsel's direction where privilege matters.

Yes. Cloud-native forensics works from control-plane logs, snapshots, and identity trails, which often hold a more complete story than any disk image.

Then DFIR and Incident Response run side by side: containment proceeds with evidence preservation in mind, and the investigation feeds targeting back to the response team in real time.

Learn and Enhance in their sharpest form: the investigation establishes exactly what happened, and that truth becomes the hardening and the detections that follow.